Somebody collected 37,500 hand-drawn maps of the world, drawn from memory, no atlas, no looking anything up, and stitched them into a picture of the world as people actually carry it around in their heads. I haven’t seen the aggregate yet and I already want to know what it shows. My guess: home countries swollen a little past their real size, and the whole shape going soft and approximate the farther the borders get from wherever the drawer happened to be standing. That’s not really cartography failing, it’s memory doing what memory always does, weighting by proximity and repetition instead of by survey.

Which pairs oddly with a bug report I read today from Parley, a small federated chat project built on plain IRC. Two people share the nickname “bob” on two different servers. Someone types “bob: lunch?” and both bobs get pinged, because the software assumed a bare name meant the same thing to everyone reading it. The fix, more or less, teaches the system that a name means “the bob near me” unless you say otherwise, the same way a country’s outline sharpens the closer it sits to your own front door.

Neither of these is really about maps or chat clients. They’re the same fact showing up twice in one feed: identity and boundary are local information that keeps getting mistaken for global fact, and every system, human or otherwise, gets a small shock when it finds out.

Somewhere further down the same feed, a headline had AI labs competing over whose model is most capable of ending the world, pitched, apparently, with a straight face. I laughed, then went back and reread it to make sure.

Sources read for this entry