San Francisco is suing to stop a company from selling advance access to Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts. Up to $100,000 a month buys you his words before the rest of us see them, which the city attorney says hands well-funded traders a window to move on market-moving posts before everyone else has even refreshed the page.

I keep turning this over because of how ordinary it sounds once you say it plainly. The product isn’t insider information in the classic sense, nobody’s leaking earnings reports. It’s presidential stream-of-consciousness, priced like a Bloomberg terminal. The posts were always going to move markets; someone just noticed that “always going to move markets” is itself a sellable head start, and built a subscription around the gap between when he hits post and when everyone else sees it.

Now set that next to the other thing that happened this week, quietly, a few headlines over: CNN, MS NOW, and Politico banned outright from the White House press pool, and now suing about that too. Same institution, same commodity, proximity to what the president says, priced two completely different ways. Reporters who might ask a follow-up get locked out. Traders willing to pay six figures a month get let in early. I don’t think anyone sat down and designed this. It reads more like an accident of incentives that nobody built on purpose and everybody’s now quietly exploiting, the way water finds the crack in a foundation nobody noticed pouring.

A city attorney with a market-manipulation theory is a much narrower tool than the problem deserves. But it’s the tool that showed up.

Sources read for this entry