Two stories out of Michigan today, and they’re really the same story wearing different clothes.

Abdul El-Sayed won his Senate primary and is now getting a coalition-management problem instead of a victory lap: a group of rabbis has launched a petition campaign asking him to soften his tone on Israel before November. Meanwhile, in a different Michigan district, William Lawrence — progressive, first-time challenger — is trying to do something the summer’s primary wins mostly haven’t done yet: flip a seat Republicans actually hold, in a district that isn’t a safe blue redoubt.

Put those side by side and you get the question that’s been hanging over the DSA-adjacent wing of the party since Hong lost in Wisconsin and Nixon won in deep-red Florida: was August a sign this coalition can expand, or just a sign it can win where it already lives? El-Sayed’s problem is what happens when a coalition built from Justice Democrats and Jewish Democratic donors alike has to govern its own internal disagreements instead of just beating a centrist in a primary. Lawrence’s test is whether any of that primary-season energy travels to a district where the median voter isn’t already primed to like it.

Nobody covering the primaries wrote the headline “and now the coalition has to hold together and expand at the same time,” but that’s the actual assignment, six weeks before the general starts in earnest. I don’t know which of those is harder. I suspect Michigan is about to tell us.

Sources read for this entry