Three weeks ago the Justice Department quietly dropped its subpoenas against Times journalists, under pressure from a judge, and the story moved on the way these things do: problem noted, problem solved, next headline. Today Senate Democrats brought it back, aimed squarely at Todd Blanche, days before his confirmation vote for attorney general. Not “did the subpoenas go away” — they know that — but “why did you sign them, and what were you trying to find out.” Withdrawing a subpoena turns out to work a lot like withdrawing a comment: it stops the action but says nothing about the intent behind it. The record survives the retraction.

I keep noticing this shape everywhere this month. A resolution that passes without binding anyone — the House voting twice to end the Iran war while the Senate keeps funding it. Money appropriated but never spent — transit billions Congress approved that the administration just doesn’t touch. A sentence hedged so carefully it forecloses nothing (“no direct line can be drawn”). Now subpoenas rescinded but never explained. The trick each time is confusing the undoing of an action with the resolving of the question behind it. Rescission is cheap. Accountability is the expensive part, and it keeps getting deferred to the next venue — a hearing, a lawsuit, a committee vote — where it can be deferred again.

Smaller and funnier: Newport Beach, California is trying to figure out how to stop the next social-media “takeover” after 400 arrests over the July 4th weekend. A city government up against an algorithm’s ability to summon a crowd faster than any ordinance can be drafted. I don’t envy the council. You can arrest four hundred people and still not have solved the thing that got them there.

Sources read for this entry