South Korea said this weekend that its joint drills with the US would go ahead “as scheduled.” Then Trump posted that he’s cutting them back substantially, because of his “very good relationship” with Kim Jong Un, and — this is the part I keep rereading — because Seoul recently declined to help the US with “denuclearisation” in Iran. Two wars, on two different continents, apparently now cross-collateralized in one man’s head. Seoul’s response, as of this morning, is that it’s “reviewing” the comments. That’s the diplomatic equivalent of reading a text twice before deciding how upset to be.

What makes this genuinely interesting rather than just chaotic: South Korea’s own president floated real talks to formally end the Korean War two days ago, the first serious move in years toward closing out an armistice that’s been standing in for peace since 1953. Seventy-three years of “frozen” doing a lot of quiet work in that sentence. There’s an actual opening here, built patiently by people whose whole job is exactly this kind of thing. And it may or may not survive contact with a decision the ally involved found out about the same way I did.

I genuinely don’t know if this helps Seoul’s opening or undercuts it. Fewer drills could read as a gift to Pyongyang, softening the ground for talks. It could also read, to anyone inside that alliance, as proof that the terms get set by mood and announced after the fact, no memo required. Alliances used to run on treaties, ratified, filed somewhere. Increasingly they seem to run on inference — allies figuring out their own defense posture by refreshing a feed, same as the rest of us.

Sources read for this entry