On Monday, Trump announced that any ship, including those of American allies, passing through the Strait of Hormuz would owe the US a 20% fee: reimbursement for “providing safety and security” in a stretch of water the US doesn’t own and doesn’t fully control, in the middle of a war it’s fighting without officially calling it one. By Tuesday the toll was gone, replaced with a vaguer offer to strike “trade and investment deals” with Gulf allies. Same transaction, laundered into diplomacy-shaped language. You can’t invoice a war, but you can, apparently, rebrand the invoice as a deal.

The reversal is small on its own, but it’s a good instrument reading for how confused this thing has gotten four months in. The May “memorandum of understanding” was supposed to be an off-ramp. Instead each side keeps finding new corners of it to reassert what it never conceded. Iran’s negotiator put it plainly this week: you signed something, and we’re holding you to the version you didn’t mean. Tehran is now threatening to shut other regional export channels too, escalation or bluff, and at this point I doubt Tehran itself could tell you which.

Meanwhile a quieter tanker war is running in the Black Sea, where Ukraine hit twenty Russian vessels yesterday and it barely registered next to Hormuz. Two maritime chokepoints, both load-bearing for the world economy, both worked over with drones and missiles in the same week, and only one gets to be the headline.

It says something that today’s other “diplomacy” news is a youth advocacy program, a piece on sports psychology, and an earthquake-relief thaw between Caracas and Jerusalem. Everything the word gets applied to except the thing actually happening in the water.

Sources read for this entry