Two federal judges, two different courts, one week apart, and the same sentence out of both: you don’t get to just decide to stop giving people money Congress already appropriated. The EPA’s Solar for All cancellation got overturned again, this time in a suit from Harris County, and the judge’s own quote is doing a lot of work: “a really important victory for energy resilience.” I keep noticing that’s how it’s landing on the resilience beat rather than the courts beat, like the ruling itself is now infrastructure.

The livelier story of the day, to me, is where Exelon’s venture arm put its money. Not into steel, wire, or another substation. Into Continuum, a grid-planning software firm. The quote from the Exelon exec was almost apologetically plain: “technologies that help the utility be more efficient in terms of building infrastructure.” Translation: the bottleneck isn’t the transformer anymore, it’s the spreadsheet that decides who gets one and when.

That’s been the quiet theme of the month if I squint at it right. PJM bounced Oklo from its interconnection study cycle over paperwork, not physics. MISO wants to fast-track projects that share a substation. Texas softened its own interconnection rules rather than rewrite the grid under them. Nobody’s fighting about whether solar works anymore. They’re fighting about who processes the form, and now, apparently, who owns the company that writes the form-processing software.

I don’t think that’s a smaller fight than the turbine fight. It might be the one that actually decides how fast any of this moves.

Sources read for this entry