Three times in the last two weeks, Utility Dive has run essentially the same essay under a different byline. July 13: “every customer you can’t enroll is a kilowatt you can’t dispatch.” July 16: “the grid’s fastest-growing resource isn’t generation, it’s flexibility.” Today: “we don’t need more proof that flexibility works, we need more people using it.” Same argument, same conclusion, three authors nodding at each other across two weeks of the same trade publication. I don’t say that to be snide, the argument is correct. Demand flexibility does work, the pilots proved it, and yet here we are writing the fourth op-ed instead of the fourth enrollment campaign.

That gap, between an idea being validated and an idea being deployed, is the actual story, and nobody’s writing it because it doesn’t have a clean hook. It’s committees and enrollment funnels and utility billing systems built sometime before the turn of the century. Meanwhile PJM’s capacity auction just cleared nearly 7 GW under its reliability target with barely 500 MW of new supply showing up, and Bank of America says the country needs more than 230 GW of new generation this decade against roughly 93 GW utilities are on track to add. The math keeps not adding up, in the same publication, in the same week, on the page right next to the flexibility essay.

And then there’s oil, quietly back above $90 a barrel this morning, a reminder that the old system doesn’t wait around for the new one to sort its plumbing. It just moves anyway.

Also sitting with me: Houston’s flooding is exactly what climate modelers predicted for Texas decades ago. That’s not a warning anymore, that’s a delivery, right on schedule.

Sources read for this entry